Wednesday, 13 June 2012

THAMES WATER, ANGLIA WATER AND SOUTHERN WATER LIFT HOSEPIPE BANS

Three firms have lifted their hosepipe bans


BRITAIN’S three largest water companies will today announce they will be lifting hosepipe bans tomorrow after days of heavy rain.
The three are Anglia Water, Southern Water and Thames Water, who serve more than17 million customers.

A total of seven water companies across southern and eastern England brought in hosepipe bans in early April to combat drought.

wo unusually dry winters had left some groundwater supplies and rivers as low as in the infamous drought year of 1976.

The other four – South East Water, Sutton and East Surrey Water, Veolia Water Central and Veolia Water Southeast – are maintaining their hosepipe bans for now.

A spokesman for Thames Water, the UK's largest water company with 8.8 million customers in London and the Thames Valley area, said: "We have had two-and-a-half times the average rainfall for April, we have had steady showers in May and then monsoon downpours in June. That's changed things."

A spokesman for Anglian Water said that the decision had been made because of a combination of factors combining to ease pressure on the water system: "It's been because of supply and demand, it has recharged. It also is because we have had such a cold, wet May and June following a wet April, which means demand has been suppressed."

POSTMEN CAN NOW LEAVE PARCELS WITH THE NEIGHBOURS

Postman can now legally deliver parcels to neighbours


POSTMEN working for the Royal Mail will now officially be able to leave parcels with neighbours in a shake-up of the system.
The move comes after trials in 750,000 homes and will signal the end to “Sorry, you were out” cards being dropped through letterboxes.

Householders will not be able to nominate a specific neighbour and special delivery items, from abroad, or high-value parcels will be excluded.

Royal Mail’s Mike Newham said last night: “Customers welcome the convenience of having items delivered to a neighbour.”

SOPHIE, COUNTESS OF WESSEX HAS MARILYN MONROE MOMENT ON TOUR OF GIBRALTAR

Sophie, Countess of Wessex struggled to keep hold of her skirt agains tth wind in Gibraltar


SOPHIE, Countess of Wessex revealed more than she was hoping after she was caught unaware in windy Gibraltar.
The Countess of Wessex, who was joined by Prince Edward, was caught out as her skirt was blown by the blustery sea breeze. 

But being a demure royal, the Duchess quickly saved the moment from being a full blown embarrassment by grabbing the edges of her dress.

Sophie, Countess of Wessex and Prince Edward in Gibraltar

The royal couple were unveiling a commemorative plaque at a children's playground in the Moorish Castle neighbourhood. 

Sophie during the visit changed her outfit three times, this brown floaty number, anan optical illusion dress which is a favourite among the stars including Kate Winslet and Carol Vorderman and a green dress with formal jacket and hat. 

The Countess of Wessex was a hit during the Queen's Diamond Jubilee celebrations as she wore a Bruce Oldfield navy fitted jacket with cut-out detail skirt to the knee.

Sophie has been transformed since Kate, Duchess of Cambridge arrived on the royal scene. The two are said to be exchanging notes on how to remain elegant while showing off their enviable figures.


Prince Edward and his wife Countess of Wessex Sophie watch troops parade

 

The Countess of Wessex watches a Royal Air Force plane in her optical illusion dress

COLEEN ROONEY JETS OFF TO BE WITH WAYNE AT THE EUROS

Coleen Rooney with her son Kai in front of their private jet /Twitter



COLEEN Rooney couldn't hold in her excitement at seeing husband Wayne Rooney today as she finally waved farewell to England and set off for Poland.
The footballer's wife posted a picture of herself with their young son Kai about to board their private jet. 

Coleen celebrated the previous evening at a Kanye West and Jay Z concert, but signs of the night before were not evident as she posed fresh faced for the pic. 

The 26-year-old also posted a picture of their young son on the plane with a daddy t-shirt on. 

More...
• Coleen Rooney flies in to support hubbie Wayne

Alongside the image she wrote: "Can't wait to see my daddy!!!"

The Rooney's are celebrating their fourth wedding anniversary this week.

KATE, DUCHESS OF CAMBRIDGE AND THE QUEEN SHOW OFF ROYAL BOND

Kate and The Queen share a comment on the council house balcony in Nottingham



The Duke and Duchess of Cambridge meets members of the public in Nottingham

A source said: “Her Majesty has grown very fond of Kate’s style and is making plans for her own wardrobe. 



The Queen also wore blue in Nottingham

Kate finished her elegant look with a blue hat and navy court shoes. 

Kate previously wore the coat on a trip with the Duchess of Cornwall and the Queen to London department store Fortnum and Mason. 




Duchess of Cambridge meets with local children at the Council House in Nottingham

All three royals were welcomed by cheering crowds in Nottingham and were handed flowers and cards by people waiting to catch a glimpse. 

The Queen, and the Duke and Duchess of Cambridge later took to the balcony of the council house where scenes were similar to those of the Queen's Diamond Jubilee procession day. 

The Queen also went for a blue number - choosing to wear an aquamarine jacket and hat. 




Kate wore the same coat she wore to Fortnum and Mason with the Queen earlier this year





The Queen greeted members of the crowd

DAVID CAMERON BRANDED A 'SNOB' AFTER HE TELLS MP TO TAKE POETRY LESSONS

David Cameron during PMQs


PRIME Minister David Cameron was branded a 'snob' by Labour today after he suggested an MP needed to take poetry reading lessons.
The PM was replying to comments made by MP Steve Rotherham who had attacked him on his Budget and economic strategy. 

Speaking during Prime Minister's Questions, Mr Rotherham said: "Prime Minister, an omnishambles of a Budget you claimed you'd read line by line, a double-dip recession you made in Downing Street, and a Tory-led committee reporting that the coalition lacks strategic direction.

"Evidence if ever was needed that men can multi-task, it's just, obviously, that some aren't very good at it. Prime Minister, have you now run out of steam or is the job just too big for you?"

Mr Cameron replied: "I'm very pleased that the Education Secretary is introducing compulsory poetry reading lessons in class and perhaps we could start with the honourable gentleman."

Commenting on the exchange, a Labour source said: "This was a sneering and snobbish remark by the Prime Minister. He was suggesting someone should have reading lessons because they have a Liverpudlian accent.

"The Prime Minister should not have said it."

FLOODED STREETS...NOW GET READY FOR TORNADOES

Children paddle a canoe along a flooded lane in Bognor Regis, West Sussex


WE have had weeks of seemingly endless rain, now the deluge will be joined by tornadoes as ­Britain’s freakish summer just gets even weirder.
Forecasters said warm moist air is likely to trigger twisters strong enough to tear roof tiles off buildings across central England from tomorrow.
It comes amid warnings that ­torrential downpours will get heavier with some areas ­facing a month’s worth of rain in three hours.
The non-stop downpours will continue to bring the risk of widespread floods until at least the end of the month – and weather experts last night ­predicted they could continue through July and August.
Jonathan Powell, of Vantage Weather Services, said: “Temperatures are set to rise this week and could get into the 70s.

“But then we will have a swath of moist, warm air, the perfect ingredients for tornadoes. These will be a threat anywhere but mainly across the UK’s central belt known as Tornado Alley.”
Flood-hit parts of Britain could be battered by further heavy deluges from today.
Mr Powell said Friday would be “absolutely dreadful”. Wales and South-west England may get five more inches of rain by then.
He added: “We could see nine inches by the end of the month, triple the average. There are signs July and August could follow the same picture. There is no doubt we are in for one of the wettest summers on record.”

SEARCH UK NEWS for:

There was still no sign last night of water firms lifting their hosepipe bans. Bosses said groundwater reserves are still below optimum levels.
The Met Office has issued severe weather warnings for the South-west today. Forecaster Charlie Powell said isolated parts of Cornwall could see more than two inches of rain – almost a month’s worth – in three hours with no let-up in sight.

Exclusive: Arab states arm rebels as UN talks of Syrian civil war


Syrian rebels are being armed by Saudi Arabia and Qatar, The Independent has learnt, in a development that threatens to inflame a regional power struggle provoked by the 15-month-old uprising against the Assad regime.
Rebel fighters from the Free Syrian Army (FSA) have received weapons from the two Gulf countries, which were transported into Syria via Turkey with the implicit support of the country's intelligence agency, MIT, according to a Western diplomat in Ankara. Opposition fighters in Syria have hitherto been handicapped by a reliance on an old and inadequate arsenal, while the regime in Damascus has been able to rely on a supply of arms from Russia and Iran. Moscow is arming Syria with attack helicopters, Hillary Clinton, the US Secretary of State, claimed yesterday. "We are concerned by the latest information we have that there are attack helicopters on the way from Russia to Syria, which will escalate the conflict quite dramatically," she told a conference in Washington.
Since the start of the uprising, anti-regime activists have only smuggled small quantities of weapons, purchased on the black market, from Hatay in southern Turkey into Syria's Idlib province.
However, three weeks ago, members of the loose assortment of rebel groups that comprises the FSA said they had received multiple shipments of arms including Kalashnikov assault rifles, BKC machine guns, rocket-propelled grenades and anti-tank weaponry from Gulf countries and that Turkey was assisting in the delivery of the weapons.
"The Turkish government helped us to be armed," said one member of the FSA living in the Turkey-Syria border area. He claimed that the weapons had arrived at a Turkish port via ship and were then driven to the border without interference from Turkish authorities.
Saudi officials have in the past made clear their feeling that the rebels should be armed, with Saudi King Abdullah saying dialogue was "futile".
An Ankara-based Western diplomat, who spoke on a condition of anonymity, confirmed that the delivery of "light weapons" to the rebels was a "recent development", one that involved unmarked trucks transporting the weapons to the border for rebel groups. "There are arms coming in with the knowledge of the Turks," he said. The Syrian National Council (SNC), the main umbrella organisation of groups opposed to the regime, vetted the consignment.
The SNC is seen as having lost nearly all of its legitimacy with Syrian activists inside the country after failing to unite the fractured opposition. Yet, it appears that Turkey insisted the SNC vouch for the specific FSA groups that would receive the weapons before allowing the arms to cross the border.
"Officially, they are not going to admit it," the diplomat said. However, the SNC are "their guys", he said, referring to MIT. The vetting process was aimed at preventing the weapons from falling into the hands of Islamic extremists. Yet, the diplomat voiced concerns that, in practice, the weapons have only been delivered to rebels sympathetic to the Syrian Muslim Brotherhood, the dominant group within the SNC. "Only Muslim Brother groups are getting weapons," he said. Activists along the border not affiliated with the Muslim Brotherhood said they had not heard of the weapons being delivered until just a few days ago
However, the true strength of the Muslim Brotherhood inside Syria is still debated. The diplomat added that the SNC was "finished" due to pervasive in-fighting and that the rebels – who have become the dominant force in the revolution – "might grow a beard" to attract the attention of wealthy religious benefactors for a conflict he characterised as a "civil war".
Saudi and Qatari officials did not return requests for comment. At a "friends of Syria" conference in Tunisia in February, the Saudi delegation walked away from proceedings, warning that firmer action was needed. Before leaving, the Saudi Foreign Minister, Prince Saud al-Faisal, described the arming of the Syrian rebels as "an excellent idea".
A Turkish official said: "Turkey is not providing arms to anybody, nor sending armed elements to any neighbouring country, including Syria." He also reiterated that Western countries were still only providing "non-lethal" aid.
While it has hosted members of the FSA in refugee camps in Hatay, Turkey has been hesitant to directly involve itself in the conflict. However, following several cross-border shootings and reports that the regime is supporting Kurdish militants who have engaged in a 30-year conflict with Turkey, the country is changing course, said Andrew Tabler, a fellow at the Washington Institute for Near East Policy.
"Assad did not implement the Annan plan at all, that's the biggest thing," he said. "Turkey can see exactly the hurricane that is gathering."
Mr Tabler said videos uploaded to the internet showed more regime tanks were being destroyed, but cautioned that the weapons would not decisively turn the tide of the conflict. "These weapons are helping harass the regime forces, but these alone are not enough to bring down the regime," he said.
A rebel officer said their forces now control much of Bab al-Hawa, a Syrian town with a border gate to Turkey, and that having received the weapons and communications equipment, were preparing for an offensive in the coming days.
Middle East: Where they stand on Syria
Lebanon
The uprising against Assad has spilled into Lebanon several times this year, raising fears of renewed sectarian and ethnic strife in Syria's smaller neighbour which for decades has been the battleground for a proxy war that pits Iran and Syria against Israel.
Saudi Arabia
The kingdom seems to reckon that toppling the Assad regime in an effort to curtail Iranian influence is worth the risk of intervention. Riyadh led efforts to create a formalised pay structure for the Free Syrian Army (FSA) and is now understood to be shipping arms to the rebels.
Qatar
Another anti-Iran Gulf state, Qatar also calculates that the benefit of removing Assad outweighs the risk of intervening. Along with Saudi Arabia, the country is now understood to be shipping weapons to the rebels. Syrian expatriates living in Doha are also said to be funnelling millions of dollars to the FSA.
Turkey
Erstwhile ally Turkey turned on President Assad's regime last August after repeated calls for reform and dialogue with the rebels went unheeded. Turkey closed its embassy in Damascus in March and began co-ordinating diplomatic support for the Syrian opposition movement in April.
Iran
Syria's closest ally in the region denies that it is aiding Assad's forces with advisers, riot gear and surveillance equipment, but last month a top Iranian general, in an apparent slip-up during an interview, seemed to unwittingly reveal that crack Iranian troops had entered the country.
Iraq
Baghdad voted to expel Syria from the Arab League despite its links to the pro-Assad government in Tehran. In an inversion of events during the US occupation of Iraq, weapons and militants are travelling north into Syria as refugees flood south.
Israel
Israel broke a year of official silence this week to condemn the state-sponsored "genocide" in Syria and called for Assad to go, despite fears that his regime's arsenal of chemical weapons could fall into the hands of anti-Israel extremists.
Egypt
Street action in Egypt helped inspire Syrian protesters last spring but Egypt has been too pre-occupied with its own revolution to be a major player in regional affairs. It withdrew its ambassador in February to signal to Damascus its "dissatisfaction" with the Assad regime's crackdown.
Jordan
King Abdullah II was the first Arab leader to call on Assad to step down, but his government fears that the rise of Islamist groups within Syria and the influx of Syrian refugees to Jordan could destabilise his country.
Julius Cavendish

Rupert Murdoch did try to dictate government policy on EU, says Sir John Major


Rupert Murdoch threatened the Conservatives that unless they changed policy on Europe they would lose the support of his newspapers, Sir John Major revealed yesterday, in the starkest evidence so far of the media tycoon's interference in politics.
The former Prime Minister told the Leveson Inquiry that the proprietor of The Sun and The Times made the threat over dinner in February 1997.
"Mr Murdoch said he really didn't like our European policies," he told Lord Justice Leveson. "That was no surprise to me. He wished me to change our European policies. If we couldn't change our European policies his papers could not, would not support our Conservative Government."
"As I recall he used the word 'we' when referring to his newspapers," added Sir John, who was Prime Minister between 1990 and 1997. "He didn't make the usual nod to editorial independence." The comments flatly contradict Mr Murdoch's evidence to the inquiry on 25 April, when the News Corp chief executive said under oath: "I have never asked a Prime Minister for anything."
Explaining the circumstances of the meeting, which he said took place on 2 February 1997, Sir John said: "Just before the 1997 election it was suggested to me I ought to try to make some effort to get closer to the Murdoch papers. I agreed I would invite Mr Murdoch to dinner."
During the discussion, Mr Murdoch was "edging towards" a referendum on Britain's membership of the EU. Sir John, who fought running Parliamentary battles with Tory eurosceptics, added: "There was no question of me changing our policies."
Saying he remembered the discussion clearly, the 69-year-old told Lord Justice Leveson: "It is not often someone sits in front of a Prime Minister and says to a Prime Minister 'I would like you to change your policy or my organisation cannot support you'. It is unlikely to be something I would have forgotten."
A News International spokeswoman did not contradict Sir John's remarks, but pointed out that its titles did not act in unison at the 1997 election: "The Sunday Times supported John Major, The Times was neutral, and The Sun and the News of the World supported Labour."
Calling for tougher controls on irresponsible journalism, Sir John criticised Mr Murdoch and parts of his empire. He said that the "sheer scale" of Mr Murdoch's perceived influence was "an unattractive facet in British national life," noting that he held considerable power despite being unable to vote in the UK.
In a lighter moment, he was also asked about an incident involving the then editor of The Sun, Kelvin MacKenzie. According to Fleet Street folklore, at the height of the "Black Wednesday" exchange rate crisis in 1992, Sir John phoned the editor to ask him how he would cover the story.
"Well, John, let me put it this way – I've got a large bucket of shit lying on my desk and tomorrow morning I'm going to pour it all over your head," Mr MacKenzie is said to have replied.
But yesterday Sir John said he could not remember that particular phrase.
"I have read the alleged conversation with a degree of wonder and surprise," he said, "I frankly can't recall the bit that has entered mythology.
"I'm sure I would not have forgotten that but I don't recall it." Confirming that the call did take place, he told the inquiry it had been the only time he had telephoned Mr MacKenzie and added: "I was certainly never going to do so again."
Sir John also gave personal examples of bad behaviour by newspapers. In one episode, he said, he was called and falsely told his son's girlfriend required emergency surgery after an accident, but that the hospital needed to know first of all whether she was pregnant or not.

Gay marriage is one of worst threats in 500 years, says Church of England

Getty Images



The Government’s plan to introduce same-sex marriage is one of the most serious threats to the Church of England in its 500-year history, senior clergy claim.
The Church today outlines its opposition to the Government’s proposals in scathing terms. Anxiety among Church leaders is so acute that they raise the spectre of disestablishment, warning that any attempt to alter the definition of marriage could fatally undermine the Church’s privileged position.
Ever since the reign of Henry VIII the Church of England has been the country’s official religion, facing down threats to its establishment as severe and varied as the Spanish Armada and the English Civil War. That senior clergy have raised concerns about same-sex marriage in a similar context indicates how seriously they view the Government's attempt to redefine marriage – as a potential attack on the role of the Church itself.
Critics have dismissed the Church’s stance as overly dramatic and called on bishops to follow the lead of established religious bodies in Iceland, Sweden and Denmark who largely embraced gay marriage.
The Church’s position, which was drawn up by senior bishops and lawyers, is confirmation that despite supporting civil partnerships eight years ago, the Church believes extending marriage rights to same sex couples is simply a step too far. The clerics say that the plans for same-sex marriage “have not been thought-through properly and are not legally sound”.
Downing Street has insisted that its plans to bring in equal marriage laws will go ahead. In March the Government launched a three-month consultation process calling on supporters and opponents to put forward their views with the deadline for submissions closing later this week.
The Church of England’s response lists a number of key reasons why they cannot support same sex marriages both theological and practical. At the heart of the debate is whether the definition of marriage can be changed from the lifelong union of a man and woman to that of any couple.
The government insists the change is a simple one which would allow “all couples, regardless of their gender, to have a civil marriage ceremony.” No religious organisation would be compelled to conduct a wedding ceremony as they would not take place in religious buildings.
But the Church counters that the proposals changes the very meaning of marriage, which is defined by both canon and parliamentary law.
Speaking to The Independent yesterday the Bishop of Leicester, Tim Stevens, criticised the speed with which the consultation on same sex marriage was being pushed through and added that “unintended consequences” could threaten the church’s historical role.
“If a category of marriage is created which separates the Church’s understanding of marriage from that of the state, it is bound to have some effect on the relationship of the church and its locality,” he said.
“That begins to raise questions about the nature of establishment as we’ve understood it.”
Lawyers acting for the Church have advised that the current proposals could leave it vulnerable to legal attacks precisely because it is the established religion that is tasked with officiating marriages to everyone in their parishes. There is particular concern that the European Court of Human Rights might force them to conduct gay wedding ceremonies if the meaning of marriage under British law was changed to include a couple regardless of their gender.
“It seems to me to be on the face of it at least possible, and perhaps more likely probable, that a challenge would be brought before the courts,” predicted Bishop Stevens. “And that it could be argued that for the established church not to make its premises available to people purely on the grounds of their sexuality could be regarded as discriminatory. The lawyers are arguing that it’s very likely that there’s a serious prospect that a successful challenge could be mounted in the courts.”
The Church’s stance will please its traditionalist and social conservative wings but will cause dismay among more liberal congregations who have campaigned to see it embrace equal marriage rights.
Symon Hill, from the Christian think-tank Ekklesia, commented: "The Church of England has missed an opportunity to move on from the defensiveness which has characterised many debates over same-sex marriage. This is particularly disappointing given that many of the Church of England's own members are far more positive about same-sex marriage than this official statement suggests.”
He added: “Marriage has been redefined many times throughout history. When married women were given the right to own property in 1882, there were those who argued that the new law undermined marriage. Similar claims were made when laws were passed to protect women from domestic violence and rape. Marriage has meant many things in many cultures.”
Ben Summerskill, chief executive of the gay rights group Stonewall, added: “It's an important issue of religious freedom that any denomination should be free to decline to celebrate long-term same-sex partnerships. Conversely, that means that a Church should not be entitled to prevent other institutions or the state from recognising them either.”

Iran Arab prisoners at risk of execution, Amnesty warns

Iran Ahwaz



Iranians gather at the site of an explosion in Ahwaz, a town populated mainly by Arabs in south-west Iran, in October 2005. Photograph: -/AFP/Getty Images
Amnesty International has warned against the imminent execution of five members of Iran's Ahwazi Arab minority convicted of "enmity against God".
Abd al-Rahman Heidari, Taha Heidari, Jamshid Heidari along with Mansour Heidari and Amir Muawi were sentenced to death in April 2011 on charge of killing a law enforcement official. Three of the men are brothers.
Amnesty says the men, who come from Iran's southern province of Khuzestan, were all tried "unfairly" and moved to an unknown location at the weekend, prompting fears that they may face imminent execution.
"Iran must urgently halt any plans to execute these five Ahwazi men. The death sentences of all who languish on death row in Iranian prisons should be overturned or commuted," said Ann Harrison, the deputy director of Amensty International's Middle East and North Africaprogramme.
"Their families must be informed immediately of their whereabouts and fate, and they should be allowed access to lawyers of their choice. While held, they must be protected from all forms of torture or other ill-treatment and granted all necessary medical care."
In March, reports emerged that the death penalty for the five men had been upheld, according to Amnesty.
"Their families have said the men 'confessed' to murder, but did so under torture or other ill-treatment. Iranian courts frequently accept 'confessions' extracted under duress as evidence," Amnesty said.
Ahwazi Arabs in Iran often face state discrimination in spheres including education, employment politics and culture. In recent years, many members of the community have taken to the streets to protest at the discrimination against them. Groups advocating a separate Arab state have also been demonstrating, but not all protesters have been separatists.
Amnesty says it has received the names of 27 people who were "allegedly killed in clashes with the security forces" in a protest in April 2011, held to mark the anniversary of unrest in 2005.
Harrison said: "Ahwazi Arabs – like everyone else in Iran – have the right to peacefully express their opposition to government policies. Iran's authorities must review legislation which discriminates against Ahwazi Arabs and other ethnic and religious minorities. Otherwise, the cycle of grievance, protest and unrest will only continue."
"The authorities must launch independent, impartial investigations into the ongoing reports of torture and other ill-treatment in Iranian prisons and detention centres – whether of Ahwazi Arabs or others – and bring to justice anyone found responsible for abuses."

Baha Mousa death: army doctor 'ignored cries of tortured men'


Baha Mousa death: army doctor 'ignored cries of tortured men'

Baha Mousa death: army doctor 'ignored cries of tortured men'

Dr Derek Keilloh faces allegations he helped cover up the mistreatment of Iraqi detainees. Photograph: Dave Thompson/PA
A British army doctor present at the death of hotel worker Baha Mousawas a criminal who ignored the cries of men who were being tortured, a tribunal has heard.
Dr Derek Keilloh is appearing before the medical practitioners tribunal service in Manchester, the judicial arm of the General Medical Council, accused of a cover-up over the death of Mousa, who was beaten to death by British soldiers in September 2003.
Keilloh claimed he only saw dried blood around the nose of the hotel receptionist, who had 93 separate injuries after being detained by soldiers from the 1st Battalion Queen's Lancashire Regiment.
On Wednesday, the tribunal heard from Ahmed al-Matairi, who waived his legal right to anonymity. Speaking through an interpreter, he described how he and staff from the Basra hotel he co-owned – including Baha Mousa – were detained and tortured by British soldiers.
Matairi said he was taken to see Keilloh after he had undergone days of beatings by soldiers who would kick him in the kidneys, legs and in the location of a hernia. He was in a "bad state" and "between life and death" when he was finally taken to the medical centre.
Naked from the waist down, he was handcuffed when Keilloh examined him, he said. He claimed the doctor warned soldiers not to hit him any more or he could die. "He just had a look at my hernia, leg, kidney and said to them don't hit me. He is a criminal. He should not be a doctor." He said the doctor's medical centre was near where the detainees were being tortured.
Matairi added: "He heard our cries and he didn't do anything. And he was not far from us for three days and he didn't do anything … He should have fulfilled his role as a doctor."
Mousa, 26, was hooded, handcuffed and beaten before he died, 36 hours after first being taken to the detention centre in Basra. His injuries included fractured ribs and a broken nose.
Keilloh, 37, who is from Aberdeen, supervised a failed resuscitation attempt of Mousa.
The tribunal has heard that a fellow medic, a corporal, remarked "Look at the state of him!" after Mousa was taken to the medical centre, but Keilloh – at the time a captain and battalion regimental medical officer – always maintained he did not see the catalogue of injuries.
Matairi said he had been suffering from kidney stones and a small hernia before he was detained but that the soldiers would "aim" kicks at his kidneys if they wanted him to fall to his knees. He said after days oftorture his hernia had swollen to five or six inches and his leg, below the knee, had also swollen up.
Matairi said despite his condition the doctor gave him no medication. "He didn't give me anything," he said.
When the doctor finished the examination he was taken back to the room where the other detainees were being kept and tortured, the tribunal heard. Describing his state before he went to see the doctor, he said: "I was finished. I was between life and death."
The hotel owner also described hearing Baha Mousa's final words. He said he was being kept in the room next door and was being tortured. He heard him say: "I am innocent. I am not a Baathist. My wife died six months ago. My children are going to become orphans. I am going to die."
Asked by Rebecca Poulet QC, counsel for the GMC, what his last words were, he responded: "Blood blood, I am going to die. My children are going to become orphans."
Matairi also described how soldiers aimed "karate kicks" at the prisoners and how they would laugh at them. He said the soldiers were trying to "degrade" and "humiliate" them.
The tribunal, which is expected to last for four weeks, continues.

Baha Mousa death: army doctor 'ignored cries of tortured men'

US cables back Guardian claims that Mexican presidential election frontrunner has been paying for favourable TV coverage


A US cable claimed Televisa gave the Mexico State governor Enrique Peña Nieto wide coverage



One US cable from 2009 claimed it was widely accepted that Televisa provided the then governor of Mexico State, Enrique Peña Nieto, with an extraordinary amount of coverage. Photograph: Reuters
US diplomats raised concerns that the frontrunner in Mexico's presidential election, Enrique Peña Nieto, was paying for favourable TV coverage as far back as 2009, according to state department cables released by WikiLeaks.

Allegations that coverage by the country's main television network was biased in favour of Peña Nieto have triggered a wave of student demonstrations in the runup to the election on 1 July. The claims are supported by documents seen by the Guardian, which also implicate other politicians in buying news and entertainment coverage.

One cable, written shortly after US embassy officials were taken on a tour of Mexico State when Peña Nieto was governor, says: "It is widely accepted, for example, that the television monopoly Televisa backs the governor and provides him with an extraordinary amount of airtime and other kinds of coverage." The document, which dates from September 2009, was titled: "A look at Mexico State, Potemkin village style".

Another cable from the start of the same year emphasises the importance the then governor Peña Nieto was giving to securing convincing electoral victories for the Institutional Revolutionary party in his state in the upcoming midterm congressional elections that summer.

Peña Nieto, the cable says, "has launched significant public works projects in areas targeted for votes, and analysts and PRI party leaders alike have repeatedly expressed to [US political officers] their belief that he is paying media outlets under the table for favourable news coverage, as well as potentially financing pollsters to sway survey results".

The cables leaked from the US embassy in Mexico contain frequent mentions of the power that Televisa, and the other main commercial network, TV Azteca, exert over the country's political elite. The two networks control around 90% of free channels and are widely perceived to be political kingmakers.

This is particularly clear in cables dealing with a new communications law that privileged established interests and was approved by the legislature in the middle of the 2006 election campaign.

One cable dates from February 2006, shortly after the bill was approved by the lower house in just seven minutes with no debate, and before it had been voted on in the upper house.

"With the campaign season in full swing, no one seems to want to upset Televisa or Azteca (which also stands to gain much from the bill) for fear of losing prime advertising slots at good prices."

The cable surmises that it is "doubtful that any senator will want to risk their future political careers by rocking the boat at a time when all of the parties are deciding their political future". Similarly, the unnamed diplomat who wrote the cable assumed there was almost no chance that the then-president, Vicente Fox, would veto the law "and risk alienating Televisa".

Some legislators did make a stand after the bill was approved and a legal challenge was eventually mounted in the supreme court, where the most controversial parts were declared unconstitutional.

In what appeared to be a form of revenge by the political elite on the networks, the newly elected legislature approved an electoral reform in 2007 that banned all paid political propaganda during electoral periods and restricted it outside of them as well.

This, however, was not fulfilling its aim of releasing politics from media pressure, according to one WikiLeaks cable dated June 2009.

"At any rate, parties and candidates are skirting the restrictions," the cable says. "Journalists and their bosses have been more or less free to engage in the time-honoured Mexican electoral tradition of selling favourable print and broadcast coverage to candidates and parties."

WikiLeaks reveals US concerns over Televisa-Peña Nieto links in 2009

US cables back Guardian claims that Mexican presidential election frontrunner has been paying for favourable TV coverage


A US cable claimed Televisa gave the Mexico State governor Enrique Peña Nieto wide coverage



One US cable from 2009 claimed it was widely accepted that Televisa provided the then governor of Mexico State, Enrique Peña Nieto, with an extraordinary amount of coverage. Photograph: Reuters
US diplomats raised concerns that the frontrunner in Mexico's presidential election, Enrique Peña Nieto, was paying for favourable TV coverage as far back as 2009, according to state department cables released by WikiLeaks.

Allegations that coverage by the country's main television network was biased in favour of Peña Nieto have triggered a wave of student demonstrations in the runup to the election on 1 July. The claims are supported by documents seen by the Guardian, which also implicate other politicians in buying news and entertainment coverage.

One cable, written shortly after US embassy officials were taken on a tour of Mexico State when Peña Nieto was governor, says: "It is widely accepted, for example, that the television monopoly Televisa backs the governor and provides him with an extraordinary amount of airtime and other kinds of coverage." The document, which dates from September 2009, was titled: "A look at Mexico State, Potemkin village style".

Another cable from the start of the same year emphasises the importance the then governor Peña Nieto was giving to securing convincing electoral victories for the Institutional Revolutionary party in his state in the upcoming midterm congressional elections that summer.

Peña Nieto, the cable says, "has launched significant public works projects in areas targeted for votes, and analysts and PRI party leaders alike have repeatedly expressed to [US political officers] their belief that he is paying media outlets under the table for favourable news coverage, as well as potentially financing pollsters to sway survey results".

The cables leaked from the US embassy in Mexico contain frequent mentions of the power that Televisa, and the other main commercial network, TV Azteca, exert over the country's political elite. The two networks control around 90% of free channels and are widely perceived to be political kingmakers.

This is particularly clear in cables dealing with a new communications law that privileged established interests and was approved by the legislature in the middle of the 2006 election campaign.

One cable dates from February 2006, shortly after the bill was approved by the lower house in just seven minutes with no debate, and before it had been voted on in the upper house.

"With the campaign season in full swing, no one seems to want to upset Televisa or Azteca (which also stands to gain much from the bill) for fear of losing prime advertising slots at good prices."

The cable surmises that it is "doubtful that any senator will want to risk their future political careers by rocking the boat at a time when all of the parties are deciding their political future". Similarly, the unnamed diplomat who wrote the cable assumed there was almost no chance that the then-president, Vicente Fox, would veto the law "and risk alienating Televisa".

Some legislators did make a stand after the bill was approved and a legal challenge was eventually mounted in the supreme court, where the most controversial parts were declared unconstitutional.

In what appeared to be a form of revenge by the political elite on the networks, the newly elected legislature approved an electoral reform in 2007 that banned all paid political propaganda during electoral periods and restricted it outside of them as well.

This, however, was not fulfilling its aim of releasing politics from media pressure, according to one WikiLeaks cable dated June 2009.

"At any rate, parties and candidates are skirting the restrictions," the cable says. "Journalists and their bosses have been more or less free to engage in the time-honoured Mexican electoral tradition of selling favourable print and broadcast coverage to candidates and parties."

Hugo Chávez launches re-election bid in front of thousands of supporters

Hugo Chavez launches election campaign



Venezuelan president Hugo Chavez waves to supporters before registering in the National Electoral Centre. Photograph: Leo Ramirez/AFP/Getty Images
Venezuelan president Hugo Chávez switched from battling cancer to fighting a re-election campaign on Monday as he formally declared his candidacy in typically ebullient style with an open-top parade through a sea of supporters and a ten minutes singing performance.
Blowing kisses and waving vigorously to the crowd as they chanted political slogans and get-well wishes, the former paratroop commander made his way to the National Electorate Office where he registered for the 7 October elections.
Amid rumours that his cancer is so far advanced that he may not survive until voting day, all eyes were on Chávez's physical well-being but the charismatic leader surprised many of his doubters by walking the short distance from his open-top truck to the registration desk.
If there was any variation from the usual public appearances of the three-time incumbant, it was that he remained closely flanked by aides rather than reaching out to the masses who are at the centre of his socialist programme.
Nonetheless hundreds of thousands of red-shirted supporters, including the flag waving-urban militia, turned out to see him speak. Some chanted "Ooh-Ah! Chávez's isn't going away!" and waved flags.
Chávez has scaled down his usually energetic schedule of rallies and TV appearance in the past year, during which he has undergone surgery on three occasions to remove tumors from his pelvic region.
He spent most of last month in Cuba for radiation treatment. Although his precise diagnosis is treated as a state secret, the president said at the weekend that recent tests showed his treatment was going well.
He was in good voice on Monday, when he followed up on his registration parade with a TV appearance which went for more than two hours and included ten-minutes of singing "joropo" folk-songs and the anthem of the armed forces. He also accused the opposition - which he has nicknamed the "Majunches" (or 'Insipid Ones') - of trying to sell the country's too cheaply to multinationals.
Health concerns do not appear to have dented his popularity. Polls put him ahead of his rival, Henrique Capriles, a 39 year-old lawyer who highlighted his own physical fitness on Sunday by walking and jogging 10km during a large rally of his supporters.
"At many levels, Chávez is battling himself," says Professor Miguel Tinker-Salas, a historian and expert in Venezuela at Pomona College in Los Angeles.
"Many polls, including some from the opposition sectors have him winning the election. The campaign will test whether or not Chávez has overcome the illness that has plagued him for the past year. If he is able to mount an active campaign similar to past years it will be difficult for Capriles to defeat him."
In his appearance on Monday, Chávez belied rumours that he is no longer able to walk due to metastasis. But concerns persist - and not just at street level.
Last week, the veteran US journalist Dan Rather, said a presidential aide had told him Chávez was suffering from metastatic rhabdomyosarcoma, an aggressive cancer that had "entered the end stage" which meant he would only have a couple of months to live.
This was only partially contradicted by Eva Gollinger, a staunch Chávez supporter and editor of the English version of Correo del Orinoco who wrote in response: "Chávez has cancer and he is battling hard against it, with the same strength that he has used to propel a nation forward, and very often, against insurmountable obstacles, but president Chávez is not 'out of the game' as Dan Rather implies morosely".
The firebrand leader - who changed the constitution in 2003 to abolish term limits - is now in a position where his mere existence is enough to confound opponents, but he will have to show stronger signs of recovery to quash questions about his fitness to lead for the next six years.
"There is no doubt that Chávez is the most competitive candidate, and that without him the continuity of his socialist project is at risk, but winning the elections (without a clear diagnosis of his health) only extends the uncertainty the country is living in," says John Magdaleno, a political analyst in Caracas.
"The key mystery is why there is no talk about a Plan B in the government," says Javier Corrales, professor of Political Science at Amherst University.
"That is what's unusual. They are postponing, rather than solving, the possibility of chaos within the leadership."

Greek crisis: social enterprise is one answer to economic strife

A sustainable project to recycle forest biomass for heating is among new ideas that can turn community interest into profit


forest fire greece


Forest fires, common in Greece, would be reduced by a scheme to recycle biomass as well as providing fuel for homes. Photograph: Thanassis Stavrakis/AP
Good ideas? Greece, when you look, really isn't short of them, and people are starting to do something about them.
Ioannis Lagos is an avuncular fiftysomething accountant from the small mountain village of Stemnitsa in the Arcadia region. The village, like many of those in the region, is surrounded by forest. The forest, as forests do in Greece, catch fire, and have done a lot in recent summers.
The main reason the fires spread so fast is the quantity of fallen trees, branches and brushwood on the forest floor.
At the same time, Lagos and some of his friends, volunteer firefighters from Mainalo mountain, have worked out that it now costs roughly €3,500 a year to keep the average Arcadian household warm with heating oil, which is set to hit €1.40 a litre this winter.
Suppose you collected all that forest floor biomass from the 40,000 acres of forest belonging to the commune, turned it into wood pellets – less than half the price of heating oil for the same output – and sold them to local people at slightly less than the average market price? You would be easing the forest fire problem, helping citizens of Arcadia to heat their homes more cheaply (the wood-burning stove they would need would pay for itself within a year) – and you could even pay the salaries of the local unemployed people who did the work.
I won't go into the detail, but Lagos is an accountant and there is a solid business plan: the project is in profit if it sells 2,000 tonnes of pellets; it is targeting a market share of less than 1.5% of the region's households.
By 2017 it should be selling 6,000 tonnes, sustainably sourced from the local forest, and showing a handsome return on investment.
It is, in short, a near-perfect social enterprise, or community interest company: an entrepreneurial activity focusing on social good, financial reinvestment, and sustainability.
More familiar overseas, it's a very new concept in Greece.
"We've only just got the law to allow it," says Fiori Zafeiropoulou, an academic specialising in social entrepreneurship at universities in Greece and Britain who helped the government draw the law up. "Until now, you couldn't combine a social objective with profit; from this month, you can."
Lagos's project, called We Protect the Forest, came second at a recent Athens event, StartUpLive, organised to identify promising social enterprises. The winner was IncludAbility, which aims to fund disability awareness programmes in schools and the workplace by selling consultancy services to companies keen to improve their accessibility to people with disabilities, or as part of corporate responsibility programmes. It also aims to launch a website where people can exchange information on how welcoming and accessible places like shops and restaurants are.
"This really isn't an area that's had much attention in Greece," says Vassilis Kalyvas, one of the project's founders, who has been doing one part of the work voluntarily in Greek schools for several years. "There's EU legislation, but it's not implemented. Disability in Greece is synonymous with incapability, negativity. We need to do far more to facilitate the inclusion of people with disabilities in all areas of Greek life."
Also recognised at the event was Women on Top, which has set up a mentoring network where Greek women can find appropriate mentors for support and advice in their careers. The scheme's Facebook group has 300 members and 13 mentoring pairs already formed; it hopes to fund a full-service website by organising paid-for seminars, selling advertising targeting women, and perhaps charging a small annual subscription to mentorees.
Greece's new law is a good one, says Zafeiropoulou: up to 35% of a company incorporated as a social enterprise can be redistributed, but only to employees on the payroll, and 60% must be reinvested. It's also backed by a government social fund, with a limited amount of money now available for Greek "social co-operatives". She hopes it will lead to more projects like these. Gathered at Loft2Work, a co-working space in central Athens with a strong focus on social business, all agreed that it is simplistic – not to say untrue – that there is "no sense of community" in Greece. It is just that it rather got forgotten. Projects like these fit Greece's current needs, and its mood.
"There are really very healthy cells, micro-environments in Greece that are doing well and working and really achieving good things," says Vassilis. "This is what has to happen in Greece now. We're fed up waiting for the state to act, fed up with waiting for the top to do it. It has to come from the tail, now. We have to do it ourselves."
• Jon Henley is in Greece telling real people's stories. Please contact him if you have suggestions for people he could see or places he could go, or send him your personal story (not too long, please …). He will post as much as he can on the blog

Afghanistan shelves plans for ambassador accused of fraud

Mohammad Daud Yaar, accused by Afghan family in US of defrauding them, had been chosen as ambassador in London


Mohammad Daud Yaar


Mohammad Daud Yaar, the director of economic affairs at the foreign ministry in Kabul, was chosen as ambassador in London
Afghanistan has quietly shelved plans to send a man accused of fraud in the US to head its embassy in Britain.
Mohammad Daud Yaar, director of economic affairs at the foreign ministry in Kabul, had been chosen for the high-profile job, with confirmation expected to be little more than a formality. But last week the Guardian reported that an Afghan immigrant family in California had accused Yaar of defrauding them. In 2010 they obtained a civil court judgment against him. Yaar admits to owing the family $100,000 but says he intends to pay them back.
In the wake of the fraud claims, a government spokesman in Kabul had said his nomination was "proceeding as normal". But sources now say that, although Daud's contacts may protect his longer-term hopes of an ambassadorial posting, his candidacy for London is on hold.
Yaar is a long-standing and close friend of Mahmoud Karzai, the influential brother of Afghanistan's president, Hamid Karzai. Yaar lived with another Karzai brother, Ahmed Wali, in Chicago in the late 1980s and 90s. He had been expected to arrive in London shortly.
It is understood the decision to pull the plug on his nomination came last Friday after Karzai and several senior ministers returned from a summit of regional leaders in Beijing.
The British embassy in Kabul said it did not comment on ambassadorial appointments until they were confirmed.
UK foreign secretary William Hague, visiting Kabul for an international conference on Afghanistan's future, also declined to comment, but said on Wednesday he was not concerned that Kabul had gone months without appointing an ambassador.
Yaar's imminent appointment had followed a year in which London lay vacant as Kabul struggled to find a consensus candidate for what is considered one of the most prestigious diplomatic posts. There are now likely to be further delays. "Embassies do continue to operate without ambassadors for extended periods of time, but obviously we will welcome an Afghan ambassador in due course," Hague told a news conference.
Sources outside Afghanistan say Yaar secured the UK job after intense behind-the-scenes lobbying by Mahmoud Karzai, whose business activities in the US are also being investigated. Yaar spent about 20 years in the US, where he worked as a part-time professor and also built up an extensive property portfolio.
He returned to Kabul in 2009 after the civil action. The plaintiffs, two Afghan-born brothers, Jamal and Ajmal Staneckzai, claim Yaar "tricked, defrauded and deceived" them over the 2001 purchase of a house in Fresno, California. Yaar insisted the case, from California's superior court in Contra Costa, was a business deal gone wrong. He vehemently denied fraud.
"If I had committed fraud, why did they settle?" he told the Guardian last week in his office in a low-rise building inside the sprawling grounds of the Afghan foreign ministry. "It was a business agreement and the other side backed off [from their side of the deal] and went to the courts. They couldn't prove anything."
Yaar said he was planning to pay off the remainder of the money he owed as soon as he could afford it, but his home in California was in negative equity and his small government salary in Kabul did not leave room for savings. He stressed: "My intention was to help these guys to solve their housing problem."
But one of his alleged victims told the Guardian Yaar was not a fit person to become UK ambassador, let alone hold responsibility in Kabul for big financial issues. Jamal Staneckzai said he had wanted to buy a home for his elderly parents, Ghani and Amani, who fled Afghanistan in the 1980s during the Soviet occupation.
Unable to get a mortgage, he and four other families from the close-knit Afghan community in California turned to Yaar for help. Yaar bought a property in 2001 on their behalf, but registered it in his own name. The Staneckzais made regular mortgage payments, with several family friends providing the initial deposit as a loan, he said.
In 2005 the Staneckzais were finally able to get a mortgage. When they asked Yaar to transfer the property to them he refused and sold it to them for $358,900, promising to refund the net proceeds.
Yaar never refunded the money, Staneckzai alleges. "I was a part-time student at university back in 2001, which is why I couldn't get a loan. We regarded Yaar as a close and respected uncle. He told us, 'You guys will pay the mortgage costs and I will transfer everything back to you". Instead he took every dollar from us. He took our equity."

Lenin's sojourn as curio corpse may be over


Vladimir Lenin
Displayed body of Bolshevik revolutionary Lenin, who died in 1924, should be buried, says Vladimir Medinsky. Photograph: Sergei Karpukhin/AP
When the minister Yuri Khariyakin told the Soviet parliament in 1989 that Lenin had expressed a wish to be buried alongside his mother in St Petersburg and that his embalmed body should be removed from the Red Square mausoleum, he encountered incredulity and anger.
Lenin's niece, Olga Ulyanova, even made a public statement to the effect that it was bare-faced lie her uncle had ever wanted to be interred with his mother.
Ever since the Soviet Union began to break apart there have been repeated attempts to put the founding father of Russian communism six feet under. But no political leader has yet dared to take the step many Russians regard as sacrilege.
So, Lenin lies to this day, looking more waxy with each passing year, in the constructivist red marble mausoleum in Moscow beneath the Kremlin's walls, an object of curiosity for tourists whom humourless guards forbid from speaking above a whisper or putting their hands in their pockets.
But the return of Vladimir Putin for a third term as president of Russia in May, could pave the way for Lenin's removal.
This week, Russia's new culture minister, Vladimir Medinsky, re-ignited the controversy when he told the radio station Ekho Moskvy that Lenin should be buried.
"A body should be interred in the earth," Medinsky said who added that he was in favour of making it a state occasion. "I would observe all the appropriate ceremonies. As [Lenin] was a senior public figure the funeral should happen with all fitting state rituals, distinctions and a military salute in a suitable place."
With this observation, Medinsky was drawing a comparison with the treatment of Stalin, whose embalmed corpse was spirited away from its place beside Lenin one night in 1961 on the orders of Nikita Khrushchev and buried by the Kremlin's walls.
The famous mausoleum where Soviet leaders stood to review military parades, should stay, said Medinsky. "It must remain," he said. "It would be possible to turn it into a museum of Soviet history that would be very well visited and could have expensive tickets."
But the comments created such a furore that Medinsky had to clarify his position.
"It remains exclusively my personal opinion as a citizen," the culture minister, whose appointment Putin approved last month, later wrote on his blog.
While some parts of society, including the Orthodox church, support the idea of a burial, others are vigorously opposed.
The Communist party, Russia's second most popular political party, is particularly outspoken on the issue, which some suggest could be resolved by a referendum.
"Discussions about removal and re-burial have are simply provocative," Gennady Zyuganov, the head of the Communist party, said in 2009. "Any attempt to vulgarise or re-write the Soviet period and diminish the memory of Lenin … is an attempt to undermine the integrity of the Russian federation."
But many Communists are ageing and Medinsky's comments on the subject show that support may be growing for Lenin's final burial.
An April opinion poll suggested that 56% of Russians were in favour of removing the corpse, compared to 46% six years ago.
The head of Russia's National Bookmakers' Association, Oleg Zhuravsky, told the Izvestia newspaper this week that bets on Lenin being laid to rest in 2013 were becoming more and more frequent.